en:pojmy:lemma - Příručka ČNK

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Lemma ======

A **lemma** is a representative dictionary form of a word, and in the proces of lemmatization during automatic language processing it is the form which is assigned to every form of the given word in the corpus. 

Approaches to lemmatization can differ in specific details, but it is generally the case that: 
  * the lemma of every Czech noun is its **nom. sg.** (the forms //lesům, lesy, lesích// have the lemma **//les//**)
  * for adjectives it is **nom. sg. masc.** (the forms //chytrého, chytrou, chytrejma// have the lemma **//chytrý//**)
  * for verbs it is the **infinitive** (the forms //chodil, chodíš, chodíme// have the lemma **//chodit//**)
 
The lemma as a unit originates from an abstraction of a [[en:pojmy:word|word form's]] morphological characteristics, and represents a set of forms which have the same root and differ only on their respective morphological affixes or orthographic form. In some approaches, the selected morphological variants are also associated with the lemma. 

===== The link between a lemma and lexeme =====

In certain respects a lemma is the same as a lexeme, differing only in the fact that the lemma is always a single word unit and in most corpora corresponds to the word form occurrences in a 1:1 ratio. Therefore in every corpus the number of lemmas is always smaller than the number of word forms (e.g. in the 100 mil. word corpus SYN2010 we find 1,7 mil. different word forms, but only 786 000 different lemmas).

===== The relation between a lemma and meaning =====

A lemma should be the basic bearer of a unit's lexical meaning. This is why corpus-based dictionaries are compiled based on lemmas. Simultaneously, there is increasingly greater emphasis is placed on an approach which points out that meaning is closely linked to a morphologically defined [[en:pojmy:word|form]], and that the lemma, with it's excessive abstraction, neglects some important semantic distinctions between forms.

===== Hyperlemmas and lemmatization of diachronic texts =====

Approaches to lemmatization can differ in selected cases. One such case is the processing of [[en:pojmy:diachronni|diachronic]], dialektological or [[en:pojmy:mluveny|spoken]] corpora, where the need to assemble word forms under one unit can be influenced by criteria other than simply falling under one morphological paradigm. However, it is always the case that a lemma is only a tool for more accessible searching, and not for the description or interpretation of language data.

In the case of the diachronic corpus [[en:cnk:diakorp|DIAKORP]], lemmatization with the help of so-called **hyperlemmas** is planned in the future. This will enable the users to find all occurrences of the given lexeme regardless of its various forms (historical and orthographic variants).

===== Lemmatization =====

Lemmatization is a part of the process of morphological (incl. word class) [[en:pojmy:anotace|annotation]]. The principle of lemmatization is the assignment of a lemma to one word form (or. group of word forms) in the corpus. 

Lemmatization is typically part of the context-based [[en:pojmy:desambiguace|disambiguation]] process of word forms in a text. Lemmatization is simple and independent of context (if the lemmatized word form belongs to the paradigm of one single lexeme, e.g. the verb form //believed// will be assigned the lemma //believe// as a representative form of the verbal lexeme regardless of context). 

On the other hand, automatized lemmatization is problematic when the lemmatized word form is homonymous, i.e. it belongs to the paradigms of more than one lexeme: e.g. the form //saw// belongs both the the paradigm of the verbal lexeme //see//, and to the paradigm of the noun lexeme //saw//. In this case the assigned lemma is decided based on context. 

==== Problems with lemmatization ====

One of the biggest linguistic and computational problems is the lemmatization of multiword expressions. Another problem of automatic lemmatization which remains unsolved is the lemmatization of all forms under one lemma even in cases where it is not appropriate e.g. //Cheers!//, when no registered meaning of the word //cheer// corresponds with the pragmatic meaning, because it does not fall under strictly morphological lemmatization. 

==== The lemmatization process ====

Automatickou lemmatizaci provádí počítačový program zvaný //lemmatizátor//, který bývá součástí morfologického [[pojmy:tag|taggeru]], provádějícího morfologickou [[pojmy:desambiguace|desambiguaci]] textu. Smyslem lemmatizace je jednak identifikovat v daném kontextu náležitý lexém u homonymních slovních tvarů, jednak umožnit uživateli pracovat nikoli jen se slovními tvary, nýbrž i s lemmaty jakožto reprezentanty příslušných lexémů a jejich paradigmat, což mu podstatně usnadňuje práci s korpusem. 

==== Related links ====

<WRAP round box 49%>
[[en:pojmy:anotace|Annotation]] • [[en:pojmy:desambiguace|Disambiguation]] • [[en:pojmy:tag|Tags and tagging]] • [[en:pojmy:word|Word form
</WRAP>
Trace: • oral2013 • lockwords • oral2008 • tag • anonymizace • bundles • lemma • strukturni_atributy_syn • regularni_vyrazy • paradigmaticky