Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:pojmy:ipm [2016/06/13 09:32] – [Využití ipm/ppm] veronikapojarova
+++ en:pojmy:ipm [2016/06/13 09:36] (current) – [Související odkazy] veronikapojarova
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ===== Use of ipm/ppm =====
-The main advantage of relativization of frequency based on corpus size enables us to compare numbers from corpora of various sizes. In the case that corpora are not the same size, absolute values can cause confusion. The [[en:pojmy:word|node form]] //stromek// in the corpora[[en:cnk:syn2010|SYN2010]] and [[en:cnk:oral2008|ORAL2008]] reaches these values:
+The main advantage of relativization of frequency based on corpus size enables us to compare numbers from corpora of various sizes. In the case that corpora are not the same size, absolute values can cause confusion. The [[en:pojmy:word|node form]] //stromek// in the corpora [[en:cnk:syn2010|SYN2010]] and [[en:cnk:oral2008|ORAL2008]] reaches these values:
 ^ ^ SYN2010 ^ ORAL2008 ^
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 | Rel. frequency (in ipm) |  3,62 |  4,45 |
-Navzdory tomu, o čem vypovídají absolutní frekvence, po přihlédnutí k celkové velikosti korpusů (SYN2010 má 122 mil. pozic, zatímco ORAL2008 jenom 1,35 mil. pozic) je slovo //stromek// v korpusu ORAL2008 relativně častější.
+Regardless of what the absolute frequencies say, after considering the size of the corpora (SYN2010 has 122 mil. positions, whereas ORAL2008 has only 1,35 mil. positions), we find that the word //stromek// is relatively more frequent in the ORAL2008 corpus.
-==== Související odkazy ====
+==== Relevant links====
 <WRAP round box 50%>
-[[pojmy:arf|ARF]] • [[pojmy:frekvence|Frekvence]] • [[kurz:chvala_korpusu#sociolingvisticke_promenneucitele_zaci_a_vek|Příklad srovnávání ipm]]
+[[en:pojmy:arf|ARF]] • [[en:pojmy:frekvence|Frequency]] • [[en:kurz:chvala_korpusu#sociolingvisticke_promenneucitele_zaci_a_vek|Example of ipm comparison]]
 </WRAP>