Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| en:manualy:morfio [2018/05/28 13:03] – [Principle] michalskrabal | en:manualy:morfio [2021/03/09 15:12] (current) – jankocek | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Morfio ====== | ====== Morfio ====== | ||
| - | {{ kurz:morfio-logo.png? | + | {{ :manualy: |
| The // | The // | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Generally every morphological relation -- excluding the semantic component, which cannot be easily grasped computationally -- is created by two other factors: | Generally every morphological relation -- excluding the semantic component, which cannot be easily grasped computationally -- is created by two other factors: | ||
| - | - a formal | + | - a formal |
| - formal differences in specific parts, so-called **formants** (morphs //-o// and //-ěný// from the previous example). | - formal differences in specific parts, so-called **formants** (morphs //-o// and //-ěný// from the previous example). | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| The output of the Morfio application is not and cannot be free of errors and without any further adjustments, | The output of the Morfio application is not and cannot be free of errors and without any further adjustments, | ||
| - | ==== Alternace | + | ==== Alternations |
| + | To require a precise congruence of form between the individual members of the morphological model would be impractical for a language such as Czech, due to the fact that within the morphological processes there are frequently cases of regular phoneme **alternations** in the base. The Morfio application reckons with alternations and their range can be set (e.g. the alternation of //e -- é// in //letět -- létat//; //i -- e// in //prosit -- prošen//; //r -- ř// in //starý -- stařec//; //sk -- šť// in //český -- čeština// etc.). | ||
| - | To require a precise congruence of form between the individual members of the morphological model would be impractical for a language such as Czech, due to the fact that within the morphological processes there are frequently cases of regular phoneme **alternations** in the base. The Morfio application reckons with alternations and their range acan be set (e.g. the alternation of //e -- é// in //letět -- létat//; //i -- e// in //prosit -- prošen//; //r -- ř// in //starý -- stařec//; //sk -- šť// in //český -- čeština// etc.). | + | ===== Non-Czech versions ===== |
| + | |||
| + | Morfio has also been successfully adapted | ||
| ===== Application images ===== | ===== Application images ===== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 49: | ||
| [{{: | [{{: | ||
| [{{: | [{{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== How to cite Morfio ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP round tip 80%> | ||
| + | Cvrček, V. – Vondřička, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cvrček, V. – Vondřička, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Non-Czech versions:** | ||
| + | |||
| + | Zasina, A. J. (2017): Konkurence koncovek -a a -u v genitivu singuláru neživotných maskulin v polštině. In: M. Stluka – M. Škrabal (eds.): Liſka a czban – Sborník příspěvků k 70. narozeninám prof. Karla Kučery. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, s. 90–98. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Škrabal, M. – Vondřička, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Related links ==== | ==== Related links ==== | ||