AplikaceAplikace
Nastavení

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:cnk:registrova_klasifikace [2020/08/31 13:40] – [List of registers] veronikapojarovaen:cnk:registrova_klasifikace [2020/09/01 18:06] (current) – [Characterization of registers] michalkren
Line 36: Line 36:
   - polythematic (+) vs. monothematic (–)   - polythematic (+) vs. monothematic (–)
   - higher (+) vs. lower (–) amount of addressee coding   - higher (+) vs. lower (–) amount of addressee coding
-  - related to the object / general (+) vs. related to the referent / particular (–)+  - general (+) vs. particular (–)
   - prospective (+) vs. retrospective (–)   - prospective (+) vs. retrospective (–)
   - attitudinal (+) vs. factual (–)   - attitudinal (+) vs. factual (–)
Line 96: Line 96:
 ==== Question answering: dynamic without addressee coding ==== ==== Question answering: dynamic without addressee coding ====
  
-This is one of the **dynamic** registers, with its most distinctive features being its **monological/unaddressed** (dimension 5) and **prospective** (dimension 7) character. We maz also mention its inclination to **spontaneity** (dimension 2) and **attitudinality** (dimension 8), which show a certain degree of interactivity and argumentativeness. It differs from the upcoming, also very spontaneous register (//conversation//), with a high level of **cohesion** (dimension 3).+This is one of the **dynamic** registers, with its most distinctive features being its **monological/unaddressed** (dimension 5) and **prospective** (dimension 7) character. We may also mention its inclination to **spontaneity** (dimension 2) and **attitudinality** (dimension 8), which show a certain degree of interactivity and argumentativeness. It differs from the upcoming, also very spontaneous register (//conversation//), with a high level of **cohesion** (dimension 3).
  
 == Excerpt == == Excerpt ==