AplikaceAplikace
Nastavení

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
en:pojmy:ipm [2016/06/13 09:32] – [Využití ipm/ppm] Veronika Pojarováen:pojmy:ipm [2016/06/13 09:35] – [Use of ipm/ppm] Veronika Pojarová
Line 7: Line 7:
 ===== Use of ipm/ppm ===== ===== Use of ipm/ppm =====
  
-The main advantage of relativization of frequency based on corpus size enables us to compare numbers from corpora of various sizes. In the case that corpora are not the same size, absolute values can cause confusion. The [[en:pojmy:word|node form]] //stromek// in the corpora[[en:cnk:syn2010|SYN2010]] and [[en:cnk:oral2008|ORAL2008]] reaches these values:+The main advantage of relativization of frequency based on corpus size enables us to compare numbers from corpora of various sizes. In the case that corpora are not the same size, absolute values can cause confusion. The [[en:pojmy:word|node form]] //stromek// in the corpora [[en:cnk:syn2010|SYN2010]] and [[en:cnk:oral2008|ORAL2008]] reaches these values:
  
 ^ ^ SYN2010 ^ ORAL2008 ^ ^ ^ SYN2010 ^ ORAL2008 ^
Line 13: Line 13:
 | Rel. frequency (in ipm) |  3,62 |  4,45 | | Rel. frequency (in ipm) |  3,62 |  4,45 |
  
-Navzdory tomuo čem vypovídají absolutní frekvence, po přihlédnutí k celkové velikosti korpusů (SYN2010 má 122 mil. poziczatímco ORAL2008 jenom 1,35 mil. pozicje slovo //stromek// v korpusu ORAL2008 relativně častější.+Regardless of what the absolute frequencies sayafter considering the size of the corpora (SYN2010 has 122 mil. positionswhereas ORAL2008 has only 1,35 mil. positions), we find that the word //stromek// is relatively more frequent in the ORAL2008 corpus.
  
 ==== Související odkazy ==== ==== Související odkazy ====