Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
en:pojmy:syntakticka_analyza [2020/12/17 11:56] – [Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing] tomasjelinek | en:pojmy:syntakticka_analyza [2020/12/17 11:59] – [Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing] tomasjelinek | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==== Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing ==== | ==== Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing ==== | ||
- | Syntactic annotation is done automatically, | + | Syntactic annotation is done automatically, |
- | The success rate of parsing is measured as UAS (unlabeled attachment score), the rate of successful parent identification and LAS (labeled attachment score), the rate of successful identification of both parent and syntactic function. In the SYN2015 and SYN2020, these rates are as follows: | + | The success rate of parsing is measured as UAS (unlabeled attachment score), the rate of successful parent identification, and LAS (labeled attachment score), the rate of successful identification of both parent and syntactic function. In the SYN2015 and SYN2020, these rates are as follows: |
^ korpus ^ UAS ^ LAS^ | ^ korpus ^ UAS ^ LAS^ | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
- | Therefore, although syntactic annotation can be used as an **approximate guide for further language research**, we must keep in mind that it is not entirely reliable. The error rate is higher for less common syntactic functions and constructions, | + | Therefore, although syntactic annotation can be used as an **approximate guide for further language research**, we must keep in mind that it is not entirely reliable. The error rate is higher for less common syntactic functions and constructions, |
[{{ : | [{{ : |