| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
| en:pojmy:syntakticka_analyza [2020/09/01 17:39] – [Searching KonText for syntactic structures: syntactic attributes] michalkren | en:pojmy:syntakticka_analyza [2020/12/17 11:59] – [Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing] tomasjelinek |
|---|
| ==== Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing ==== | ==== Automatic syntactic annotation: parsing ==== |
| |
| Syntactic annotation is done automatically, using a stochastic program ([[en:pojmy:parser|parser]]), in this case the TurboParser program. This kind of annotation has a much lower error rate than [[en:pojmy:morfologicka_analyza|morphological annotation]]. Approximately 1/6 [[en:pojmy:token|tokens]] are left without a correctly identified „parent“ or correctly matched syntactic function. The success rate of parent identification, i.e. UAS (unlabeled attachment score), is 88,48 %; the success rate of both parent and syntactic function identification, i.e. LAS (labeled attachment score), is 82.46%. Therefore, although syntactic annotation can be used as an **approximate guide for further language research**, we must keep in mind that it is not entirely reliable. The error rate is higher for less common syntactic functions and constructions, whereas the most frequent functions in expected contexts have an error rate lower than 10%. | Syntactic annotation is done automatically, using a syntactic ([[en:pojmy:parser|parser]]). For the annotation of the SYN2015 corpus, the TurboParser was used, for SYN2020, a "neural" parser of the NeuroNLP2 tools was used. This kind of annotation has a higher error rate than [[en:pojmy:morfologicka_analyza|morphological annotation]]. In SYN2020, more than 1/9 [[en:pojmy:token|tokens]] are left without a correctly identified „parent“ or correctly matched syntactic function, in SYN2015, it's as much as 1/6 of [[en:pojmy:token|tokens]].\\ |
| | The success rate of parsing is measured as UAS (unlabeled attachment score), the rate of successful parent identification, and LAS (labeled attachment score), the rate of successful identification of both parent and syntactic function. In the SYN2015 and SYN2020, these rates are as follows: |
| | |
| | ^ korpus ^ UAS ^ LAS^ |
| | | SYN2015 | 88,48 % | 82,46 % | |
| | | SYN2020 | 92,39 % | 88,73 % | |
| | |
| | |
| | Therefore, although syntactic annotation can be used as an **approximate guide for further language research**, we must keep in mind that it is not entirely reliable. The error rate is higher for less common syntactic functions and constructions, whereas the most frequent functions in expected contexts have an error rate lower than 5% (SYN2020) or 10% (SYN2015). |
| |
| [{{ :pojmy:mf041122_color.jpg?400|}}] | [{{ :pojmy:mf041122_color.jpg?400|}}] |
