AplikaceAplikace
Nastavení

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
en:manualy:morfio [2020/02/19 17:59] – [Alternace] michalskrabalen:manualy:morfio [2021/02/10 10:27] – michalskrabal
Line 14: Line 14:
 Generally every morphological relation -- excluding the semantic component, which cannot be easily grasped computationally -- is created by two other factors: Generally every morphological relation -- excluding the semantic component, which cannot be easily grasped computationally -- is created by two other factors:
  
-  - a formal congurence/similarity in particular parts of the word, so-called **bases** (e.g. //dřev-// is held in common by the words //dřevo// and //dřevěný//) +  - a formal congruence/similarity in particular parts of the word, so-called **bases** (e.g. //dřev-// is held in common by the words //dřevo// and //dřevěný//) 
   - formal differences in specific parts, so-called **formants** (morphs //-o// and //-ěný// from the previous example).    - formal differences in specific parts, so-called **formants** (morphs //-o// and //-ěný// from the previous example). 
  
Line 37: Line 37:
 ==== Alternations ==== ==== Alternations ====
  
 +To require a precise congruence of form between the individual members of the morphological model would be impractical for a language such as Czech, due to the fact that within the morphological processes there are frequently cases of regular phoneme **alternations** in the base.  The Morfio application reckons with alternations and their range can be set (e.g. the alternation of //e -- é// in //letět -- létat//; //i -- e// in //prosit -- prošen//; //r -- ř// in //starý -- stařec//; //sk -- šť// in //český -- čeština// etc.).
  
-To require a precise congruence of form between the individual members of the morphological model would be impractical for a language such as Czech, due to the fact that within the morphological processes there are frequently cases of regular phoneme **alternations** in the base.  The Morfio application reckons with alternations and their range acan be set (e.g. the alternation of //e -- é// in //letět -- létat//; //i -- e// in //prosit -- prošen//; //r -- ř// in //starý -- stařec//; //sk -- šť// in //český -- čeština// etc.).+===== Non-Czech versions ===== 
 + 
 +Morfio has also been successfully adapted to other languages: Polish and Latvian. The language can be switched at the top of the query form under the Language option (the default is Czech). 
  
 ===== Application images ===== ===== Application images =====
Line 46: Line 49:
 [{{:kurz:morfio-prod.png?direct&200|An estimate of the productivity of the individual types}}] [{{:kurz:morfio-prod.png?direct&200|An estimate of the productivity of the individual types}}]
 [{{:kurz:morfio-help.png?direct&200|Morfio application help}}] [{{:kurz:morfio-help.png?direct&200|Morfio application help}}]
 +
 +
 +===== How to cite Morfio =====
 +
 +<WRAP round tip 80%>
 +Cvrček, V. – Vondřička, P.: Morfio. FF UK. Praha 2013. Dostupný z WWW: <http://morfio.korpus.cz>.
 +
 +Cvrček, V. – Vondřička, P. (2013): Nástroj pro slovotvornou analýzu jazykového korpusu. //Gramatika a korpus 2012//. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.
 +
 +**Non-Czech versions:**
 +
 +Zasina, A. J. (2017): Konkurence koncovek -a a -u v genitivu singuláru neživotných maskulin v polštině. In: M. Stluka – M. Škrabal (eds.): Liſka a czban – Sborník příspěvků k 70. narozeninám prof. Karla Kučery. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, s. 90–98.
 +
 +Škrabal, M. – Vondřička, P. – Cvrček, V. (2020): Morfio – A Corpus-Based Perspective on Latvian Morphology. In: A. Utka et al. (eds.): Human Language Technologies – The Baltic Perspective. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference Baltic HLT 2020. Amsterdam: IOS Press, s. 207–214.
 +</WRAP>
 +
  
 ==== Related links ==== ==== Related links ====

Trace: